Blog

Numbers That Don't Lie

According to the FIFA Global Transfer Market Report, more than 16,000 international transfers were registered at the professional level in 2023. That is only the tip of the iceberg. It is estimated that across the professional and semi-professional levels in Europe alone, hundreds of thousands of club changes take place every year, the vast majority of them outside any organised system, handled by phone, personal connections, and coincidence.

According to the CIES Football Observatory, more than 60% of transfers below the top flight are initiated through informal recommendations: a call from a friend, a message on WhatsApp, a conversation after a match. As many as 78% of sporting directors and scouts admit they regularly miss candidates because they simply did not reach them at the right point in the transfer window. The average time to identify and finalise a transfer through traditional methods ranges from six to fourteen weeks. Only one in five players under the age of 23 playing in Poland is visible to scouts outside their own regional league.

These numbers have real faces and real consequences.

What It Actually Looks Like From the Inside

Picture a sporting director at a first-division club. The transfer window opens in three weeks. He needs a central defender, at least 185 cm, comfortable in a high press, with experience at second-division level or above, ready to relocate quickly. He picks up his phone and starts calling: agents he has worked with before, coaches he knows at other clubs, a former scout who now runs his own consultancy. A week later, he has eight names in his notebook. Three of the players are already in negotiations with other clubs. Two have contracts with no early termination clause. One does not meet the height requirement. The remaining two do not want to move. Time has passed, the window is still open, and the decision is made under pressure: the club takes a player from the local market, less suited to the role but available.

This is not a fringe scenario. It is the standard recruitment process at clubs playing in the second, third, and fourth tiers in Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, and dozens of other European countries where the market is nowhere near as centralised as the Premier League.

Now consider the other side of that same story. A player, 24 years old, central defender, second division, 182 cm, strong in one-on-one duels, contract expiring in four months. He wants to move up. He sends emails to the general inboxes of clubs, because there are no other contacts available. He messages agents he found on LinkedIn and a few reply while most do not. One tells him he has "something in mind," but three weeks later the conversation goes cold. The player does not know how many clubs have actually seen his details. He does not know whether anyone has watched his footage. He does not know if anyone is actively looking for him.

Four months pass. His contract expires. He signs an extension at the same club because nothing else came through. And the sporting director from the previous story, the one who needed a central defender, never heard of him.

Three Systems Failing at the Same Time

The problem has three layers that reinforce each other.

The first is information noise. The transfer market at semi-professional and lower professional levels has no centre. Enquiries land in general inboxes and club secretariats that have neither the authority nor the tools to process them. Agents are selectively responsive depending on how much a given transaction will earn them. A player without representation is practically invisible to anyone outside his immediate network, and nobody will tell him why.

The second layer is geographic reach. The transfer market at lower professional levels operates like a series of closed archipelagos. A scout based in Poznan knows players from the Wielkopolska region. An agent working out of Krakow operates in the south. A club from Bialystok rarely encounters players from western Poland, not because they are not there, but because no mechanism exists to connect them. The further from major centres, the lower in the league pyramid, the less visibility a player has, regardless of his actual quality.

The same applies to young players in academies. Parents of a 17-year-old playing in a second or third-tier academy know that the window for a potential transfer to a better programme, abroad or in another city, is limited. But they do not know how to reach the heads of scouting at academies that might realistically be interested. They send emails. They record footage. And they wait. Most never receive a response, not because their son is not good enough, but because the message landed in a "to be reviewed" folder and will never make it back to the top of the queue.

The third layer is the absence of standardised data. Every club stores player information differently: one in a spreadsheet, another in a CRM built for entirely different purposes, another solely in the head of an assistant coach who just changed jobs. There is no shared player profile format accessible externally. There is no single place where you can check in thirty seconds whether a player is available, when his contract ends, and what his statistics from the last two seasons look like in a format that allows comparison across leagues. Every enquiry starts from scratch.

A Concrete Example: The Striker Nobody Saw

Michal is 21 years old and plays in the Polish second division, the third tier of the league system. Fourteen goals in the league season, an above-average shot conversion rate, strong physical data, and a genuine willingness to move clubs and relocate. His coach says it plainly: one of the best strikers he has worked with at this level.

The problem is systemic, not personal. Michal does not have an agent, because agents at this level work on transfer commissions, and in the Polish second division those commissions are low enough that most agents simply have no interest in actively promoting players like him. His statistics are not in any database accessible to scouts from higher tiers. He uploads match footage to YouTube without metadata or tags, because nobody told him it matters. He created a LinkedIn profile a year ago and does not know what to write in it.

When a first-division club from the Mazovia region was looking for a striker during the summer window, the sporting director contacted a network of twelve clubs he had worked with before. None of them knew Michal. The transfer did not happen. The club took a player from the local market, statistically less effective but "proven" through a familiar network. Michal finished the season where he started it, increasingly frustrated and increasingly convinced that the system is working against him.

He is not wrong. He just does not understand the mechanism of his own invisibility.

What It Should Look Like

The alternative scenario does not require a revolution. It requires infrastructure.

The club from Mazovia opens a platform and enters its criteria: striker, 19 to 24 years old, minimum ten league goals in the season, second division or equivalent, willing to relocate, free or with a contract expiring within three months. Michal appears in the results, because he has a standardised profile with contract data, statistics from the last two seasons, and verified match footage. The sporting director clicks through, reviews the numbers, watches four minutes of condensed match material, and sends a message directly to the player, not to a secretariat, not to an agent who may not reply. Contact happens within 48 hours of entering the first search criterion.

The same logic works in the other direction. A first-division club in the Czech Republic looking for a left back with pressing experience finds a player from Romania that no Czech-Romanian agent would ever have matched, because nobody in that network knows both markets simultaneously. An academy in Germany searching for a 16-year-old midfielder with a high progressive pass completion rate receives an alert about a player from Poland whose parents are actively looking for a better development environment, because the boy has outgrown the academy he is currently in, everyone around him knows it, and yet nobody outside his region has ever heard of him.

Transfers Are Transactions. Transactions Require Information.

Every mature market, whether in finance, real estate, or labour, operates on the principle of symmetric access to information. Both sides see the same data, can ask questions, and make decisions based on facts rather than on whose phone happened to reach the right number at the right moment.

The transfer market at professional and semi-professional level does not have that yet. The structural solution comes down to three things: centralising player profiles in a standardised format covering contract data, statistics, and verified video material; providing tools for active search based on criteria matched to market realities such as position, physical parameters, performance metrics, availability, and location; and reducing the time between identifying a candidate and making first contact from weeks to hours. The system must work in multiple directions: a player looks for a club, a club looks for a player, an academy looks for talent, a scout looks for a mandate, an agent looks for a player to represent without having to enter a purely commission-based transaction.

Conclusion

The transfer system at professional and semi-professional level is broken, not because talent is missing and not because clubs are uninterested. What is broken is the flow of information: too slow, too random, too dependent on who you happen to know and which network you happen to move in. There are hundreds of Michals out there. And there are just as many sporting directors sitting with a phone in their hand through two weeks of a transfer window. Both of them pay the cost of a system that does not work, just in different ways.

Technology solves this problem. Not because it is fashionable, but because information only has value when it reaches the right person at the right time.